acknowledgment you
as
state
• your opinion that it was
my primary duty
as "Treasures
" to see that Government monies which reached the Treasury
were all
duly
credited to
Government and not stolen
Lis
my office" and you
request me
to state that I did fulfil my duty as Treasurer in seeing
that the amounts which reached the Treasury were credited to Government
and in support of my statement I beg to remind you that the payments on behalf of Crown Rent which reached the Cashier were correctly entered in the Collection books of each county and that the books of both Alves and the responsible shroff were duly paid into the Bank, a fact of which I satisfied myself by comparing them with the Bank receipts.
It is true that a comparison was made to explain why I failed in this duty and what steps I took with a view to discharging it.
In reply, I beg to state that I did fulfil my duty as Treasurer in seeing that the amounts which reached the Treasury were credited to Government.
The sums stolen by Alves never reached the Treasury. They were improperly paid by the Public to him personally, in his private room, without my knowledge.
acknowledgment you
as
state
• your opinion that it was
my primary duty
as "Treasures
" to see that Government monies which reached the Treasury
were all
duly
credited to
Government and not stolen
Lis
my office" and you
request me
} {
books of
both Alves
717
and
the responsible shroff and
wvere
duly paid into the Bank, fact of which I satisfied myself by comparing
Q
with the Bank receipts.
morthly
Collector's
the
account
It is true that a
comparison
to
explain why
I failed in this duty and-
what steps I took with a view to discharging
In reply
reply I beg
کرنے
to state that
I did fulfil my duty
Treasurer in seeing
Aud
that the
to
amounts which reached the
were credited
Treasury Government
and in support
of my statement I beg
remind you
on
to
that the payments behalf of Crown Rent which reached the Cashier were correctly entered in
Collection
books
of each coun
Prade
terfoil receipt
by Alver with the
Real Hall would have their
discrepancies
when at
bruck I did not
Freamy
and do
not now consider that in view
of the Preasurer's letter of 222 March 1899- such detailed
companion could
ૐ
Considered as
fairly be
part of my
duties.
The sums stolen by Alves never reached the Treasury
They
were imp
paid by
the Public to him personally-
in his private room
without
my
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.